Different Leadership Styles & Approaches-Free-Samples for Students

Question: Discuss about the Leadership and Managerial Skills. Answer: Introduction Leadership and managerial skills have been pivotal in achieving success within an organization setup. The approaches to be undertaken and implied within an organization depend upon the current situational analysis of the organization. In the essay, the different styles of leadership such as the contingency as well as the laissez fair leadership had been discussed. The study also discusses the effectiveness of individual approach in the context of public health. However, the affectivity needs to be measured to evaluate the loopholes further. The gaps thus identified had helped in providing better health care and support to individual support users seeking medical help. The applications of such models had also helped in the establishment of standard services and models. However, there are a number of loopholes associated with the implications of appropriate set of models within a care set up. In this context, a number of ethical implications attached within a health care setup had been considered. Thus, adopting a person centred approach provides sufficient autonomy to the support users. However, at the same time there had been a number of limitations concerning the health situation of the respective support service users. Leadership approach In the current study, the situational or the contingency model had been applied. The models had been applied in a hospital care set up in order to provide better care and supervision to the elderly patients. The elderly patients were often at a risk of contracting injury to falling down accidentally. Therefore, proper and sufficient care measures had to be applied in order to provide them with safe measures. In this context, application of the contingency model had helped me as a trainee health professional working for the Nightingale hospital. The contingency leadership approach advocates that the effective leadership be subjected to current situational analysis (Aarons, 2015). It was further dependent upon a number of variables and attributes, which were subject to change and constant revival. The contingency approach could be further divided into task motivate and relationship motivated. With respect to task motivated, the leadership style was only dependent upon achieving success in meeting the criteria of the task. However, the relationship motivated aspires for the establishment better and transparent relationship with the care users. I personally had preferred to use the relationship model for communicating more fluidly as well as understanding the requirements of the support users. The contingency model states that the situations could be accessed further based upon these factors such as: There had to be a feeling of confidence and loyalty in the followers towards their leaders The task structure needed to be spelt out clearly and transparently to the subordinates. The leader needed to follow a punishment and award based system to meet the target requirements. The leader had to be efficient enough to generate sufficient motivation in the followers for meeting the target requirements. Moreover, I think the application of the contingency model was based upon the current situation and demands. Therefore, I need to be more flexible with my approach depending upon the requirements of the support users within my care setup. Thus, as health care professional looking after the working of my subordinates I needed to focus both on the attainment of the task goals as well as should have established clear communication and relationship with my subordinates. In this context, failure in establishment of clear communication gaols resulted in less productive work to be extracted from the staff of the nightingale hospital. Thus, I would need to focus more upon the Least Preferred Co-worker measurement (LPC). In this respect, maintaining a high LPC meant that I established better understanding relationship with my subordinates. It also built the foundation for trust and confidentiality within a care set up. This helped me in addressing the employee grievances and uplifting the overall productivity of the care set up. On the contrary maintaining a low LPC meant that I had to focus more upon getting the work extracted from my employees. However, the approach adopted by me was subjected to change depending the situational analysis. In this respect, an unfavourable situation meant that a low LPC had been followed instead. That helped me in meeting the organisational goals and demands. Thus, the contingency model provides the leader with sufficient room to change his options based upon the situational demand and analysis (Slayton, 2015). Effectiveness of the contingency approach A number of benefits were provided by the application of the contingency model within a hospital administrative setup. In this context, the model was more open-minded allowing for effective decision making and application based upon the current situation. The model helped to identify the problem and provide effective solution under different conditions. However, there were limitations as I realized that a particular approach to a problem might not guarantee solution amidst other conditions. The implication of the model helped one in understanding the contextual, organizational as well as relative human dimensions. The requirements vary from each and every individual organization. This called for revision of the contextual policies and frameworks within an organization. The changes attributed were in need to be constantly evaluated in order to understand the benefits or the deficits. The loopholes or the gaps identified helped me in arriving at a suitable and acceptable solution. I think application of the contingency model had help me in meeting the service needs and demands of my current organization along with providing me with better decision making and judgemental skills. Ethical implications There are a number of ethical issues attached with the application of the contingency model. One of the major limitations possessed by the model is its stringent structure, which could result in the development of conflicting situations at work. In my role as a practising health care professional following the contingency model, I think lack of proper set of rules or guidelines was detrimental. The lack of guidelines had put me in a situation of professional fix where the making of the judgments was based upon reflecting in the present situation(Kock, Project Management Journal). Moreover, the set rules and guidelines vary from one organization to the other. Therefore, a model implied within my current set up may not be acceptable in a different situation and surrounding. Moreover, I was also apprehensive about the professional contributions of the model. Moreover, the changing situations had put me in an unfavourable condition where I had to put extra work pressure upon my subordina tes for meeting the target requirements. However, most of the times the health professionals and colleagues working under my instructions found the work load irrational. This often resulted in a situation of organizational dispute whereby the entire team failed to meet the required targets. Additionally, lack of sufficiency guide and help from senior and experienced health care professionals resulted in a situation of huge organizational gap(De Clercq, 2014). I also needed to ensure that by the application of the model I was able to provide sufficient growth opportunities to my employees. This helped me in meeting the productivity of the organization along with raising the services and standards. Evaluation of other leadership approaches One of the other conventional approaches, which could have been implied over here, was the laissez free model. The laissez free model helped in providing sufficient autonomy to the employees within a care setup. The model is also known as hands free model where the leader was just a nominal head. In this context, the leader had little or no role to play within an organizational setup. The decision-making, setting up goals of the organization were dependent upon individual concerns and shared equally by all(McCleskey, 2014). This provided enough room to the subordinates. In my opinion, I think application of the laissez free model would have helped me in avoiding the workplace conflicts. Moreover, I would have been more open to ideas and solutions provided by my subordinates. I could use the vast amount of choice and options available in order to narrow down the options to the best suited alternative. However, there were a number of ethical implications as well. The model lacks any defined leadership involvement and approach, which would have developed into a more chaotic situation(Elsey, 2016). Additionally, the lack of effective leadership could make the organization more directionless in that way. Conclusion The present study focuses upon the different leadership approach, which needs to be adopted within an organizational set up. However, the style of leadership may vary with the organization where the model was implemented. The current study highlights the different leadership styles and approaches such as the contingency model and the laissez free model. In this context, the effectiveness of the contingency model had been demonstrated. The model provides sufficient room for flexibility within an organization. The optimum utilization of the model however demands sufficient participation of the employees. Additionally, for the successful implementation of the model clear and transparent communication practices had to be maintained within the organization. Thus, effective relation building and communication goals helped me in meeting the productivity demands within an organization. Bibliography Aarons, G. A. (2015). Leadership and organizational change for implementation (LOCI). implementation science , 11. De Clercq, D. B. (2014). Servant leadership and work engagement: The contingency effects of leaderfollower social capita. Human Resource Development Quarterly , 183-212. Elsey, J. . (2016). Manipulating human memory through reconsolidation: Ethical implications of a new therapeutic approach. AJOB Neuroscience, 7(4) , 225-236. Kock, A. H. (Project Management Journal). A Contingency Approach on the Impact of Front?End Success on Project Portfolio Success. 2016 , 115-129. McCleskey, J. A. (2014). Situational, transformational, and transactional leadership and leadership development. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly , 117. Slayton, R. B. (2015). Vital signs: estimated effects of a coordinated approach for action to reduce antibiotic-resistant infections in health care facilitiesUnited States. 25-35.